<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:php="http://php.net/xsl" version="2.0"><channel><title>[Commons-Law] relay
                
                Comments</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/</link><description>Comments </description><generator>Flux CMS - http://www.flux-cms.org/</generator><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>door: [Commons-Law] German IT Industry Body Claims Software Patents Are Unconstitutional</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2009/11/17/commons-law-german-it-industry-body-claims-software-patents-are-unconstitutional.html#c4673</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2009/11/17/commons-law-german-it-industry-body-claims-software-patents-are-unconstitutional.html#c4673</comments><author>door &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I think we should not criticize any one, just try to improve our performance and thanks for such fabulous website.Good job regarding the design of this website. I have visited many websites, but this website is fabulous. I hope, I will be able to read about the computer related terms on this website soon.</content:encoded><dc:date>2009-12-08T06:45:50Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-german-it-industry-body-claims-software-patents-are-unconstitutional.html#c4673</guid></item><item><title>Techtalk: [Commons-Law] Amended IT Act comes into effect</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2009/10/28/commons-law-amended-it-act-comes-into-effect.html#c4635</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2009/10/28/commons-law-amended-it-act-comes-into-effect.html#c4635</comments><author>Techtalk &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;p class="c1"&gt;
 The proposed notification seems to be a rumour than reality. The Information Technology Amendment Act 2008 (IT Act 2008) must be notified in official gazette by the Central Government u/s 1(2) of the IT Act 2008. There is no information whatsoever that it has been notified except some news reports. None of these reports have provided either the
 text of the notification or the link to the website wherein that notification has been published. Even the notification number is missing.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 On the other hand there are clear hints from the Law Minister Mr. Molly that the Information Technology Act 2000 and IT Act 2008 would be &lt;a href="http://cyberlawsinindia.blogspot.com/2009/09/indian-information-technology-amendment.html"&gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style="color:#3333ff;"&amp;gt;further amended&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;. For reliable
 and up to date information, keep a check upon the &lt;a href="http://cyberlawsinindia.blogspot.com/"&gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style="color:#3333ff;"&amp;gt;Cyber Law In India&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt; resource. More details about the present notification fiasco would be published there very soon.
&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded><dc:date>2009-10-28T04:05:57Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-amended-it-act-comes-into-effect.html#c4635</guid></item><item><title>T: [Commons-Law] Bruce Perens: Analyzing Microsoft's TomTom Lawsuit</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2009/03/03/commons-law-bruce-perens-analyzing-microsoft-s-tomtom-lawsuit.html#c4221</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2009/03/03/commons-law-bruce-perens-analyzing-microsoft-s-tomtom-lawsuit.html#c4221</comments><author>T &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Even your description of APRS doesn't include an internet connection. While someone may have been able to monitor the cars position via the internet in 99, the connection to the internet was made at a repeater and may have been uni-directional as far as the car was concerned. The maps you referred to were most likely locally generated, on a laptop
with a cdrom drive. Becareful that you don't assemble an argument based on hindsight....everything looks obvious when you use hindsight from a decade away.</content:encoded><dc:date>2009-03-03T12:44:41Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-bruce-perens-analyzing-microsoft-s-tomtom-lawsuit.html#c4221</guid></item><item><title>Carlton Joyner: [Commons-Law] Google Image Search in Copyright Trouble in Germany</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/15/commons-law-google-image-search-in-copyright-trouble-in-germany.html#c4114</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/15/commons-law-google-image-search-in-copyright-trouble-in-germany.html#c4114</comments><author>Carlton Joyner &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">2vnsn5ffs474b7l4</content:encoded><dc:date>2008-11-13T04:21:45Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-google-image-search-in-copyright-trouble-in-germany.html#c4114</guid></item><item><title>Dwain Roach: [Commons-Law] Update on the Novartis case &#x2013; Hearings on Novartis&#x2019; appeals to commence in November 2008</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/18/commons-law-update-on-the-novartis-case-hearings-on-novartis-appeals-to-commence-in-november-2008.html#c4113</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/18/commons-law-update-on-the-novartis-case-hearings-on-novartis-appeals-to-commence-in-november-2008.html#c4113</comments><author>Dwain Roach &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">c1uwr9rnd40gb5ms</content:encoded><dc:date>2008-11-13T03:03:50Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-update-on-the-novartis-case-hearings-on-novartis-appeals-to-commence-in-november-2008.html#c4113</guid></item><item><title>Kris Haney: [Commons-Law] Incisive Ars report on dodgy piracy statistics</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/13/commons-law-incisive-ars-report-on-dodgy-piracy-statistics.html#c4112</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/13/commons-law-incisive-ars-report-on-dodgy-piracy-statistics.html#c4112</comments><author>Kris Haney &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">69u0lqxi5m7knlye</content:encoded><dc:date>2008-11-13T02:24:22Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-incisive-ars-report-on-dodgy-piracy-statistics.html#c4112</guid></item><item><title>Alvin Estrada: [Commons-Law] President Bush Signs New IP Enforcement Bill Into Law</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/15/commons-law-president-bush-signs-new-ip-enforcement-bill-into-law.html#c4111</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/15/commons-law-president-bush-signs-new-ip-enforcement-bill-into-law.html#c4111</comments><author>Alvin Estrada &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">2orhrwr5un1y6iu7</content:encoded><dc:date>2008-11-12T22:22:44Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-president-bush-signs-new-ip-enforcement-bill-into-law.html#c4111</guid></item><item><title>Kenton Cline: [Commons-Law] Tomorrow (October 14) is Open Access Day</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/14/commons-law-tomorrow-october-14-is-open-access-day.html#c4110</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/10/14/commons-law-tomorrow-october-14-is-open-access-day.html#c4110</comments><author>Kenton Cline &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">p48usm0t7hk050b0</content:encoded><dc:date>2008-11-12T20:54:12Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-tomorrow-october-14-is-open-access-day.html#c4110</guid></item><item><title>Cathy Davidson: [Commons-Law] 2008 Digital Media and Learning Competition</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/08/21/commons-law-2008-digital-media-and-learning-competition.html#c4007</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/08/21/commons-law-2008-digital-media-and-learning-competition.html#c4007</comments><author>Cathy Davidson &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Thanks so much for posting about the new Digital Media and Learning Competition focusing on Participatory Learning. Deadline is October 15 so thanks for spreading the word. Competition site is www.dmlcompetition.net. Thanks again,</content:encoded><dc:date>2008-08-22T15:20:58Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-2008-digital-media-and-learning-competition.html#c4007</guid></item><item><title>Dr.Rege: [Commons-Law] ICMR to patent mosquito trap</title><link>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/06/09/commons-law-icmr-to-patent-mosquito-trap.html#c3774</link><comments>http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/archive/2008/06/09/commons-law-icmr-to-patent-mosquito-trap.html#c3774</comments><author>Dr.Rege &lt;undisclosed@example.org&gt;
                        </author><content:encoded xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Pl keep me posted on this</content:encoded><dc:date>2008-06-10T08:55:19Z</dc:date><guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonslaw.freeflux.net/blog/commons-law-icmr-to-patent-mosquito-trap.html#c3774</guid></item></channel></rss>
